Monday, 31 January 2022

Hospital workers take on SERCO

 


 

The Guardian reports thst “hundreds of workers at NHS hospitals in London including porters, cleaners and catering staff are to go on strike from Monday in a dispute over pay. The staff employed by the outsourcing company SERCO at St Bartholomew’s, the Royal London and Whipps Cross are walking out for two weeks. They are members of the Unite union, which claims that mainly black, Asian and ethnic minority staff are paid up to 15% less than directly employed NHS workers."

 

As a former Barts patient who had to swallow Serco 'food' for seven weeks and witnessed the disgraceful treatment of the catering and cleaning staff, I am in full support and solidarity with them and will attend the UNITE rally at the hospital Here is what I wrote about Serco soon after my hospital stay.

 

"Serco provides services in defence, justice and immigration, transport, prisons and catering. In 2006 they started moving into the NHS ‘market’, including clinical services, hospital management and catering.


When I say ‘provides services’ that is not strictly correct. Serco provides nothing. At least nothing tangible. It does provide profits to the company and its shareholders. The actual ‘providing’, of getting a specific job carried out, is done by others. If they have expertise in anything, it is as financial managers and middlemen. Serco sub-contract the real work to others.


In 2014, Serco withdrew from the NHS clinical services market after eight years. This followed a series of loss-making contracts and fines totalling £100 million. They admitted giving false data to the NHS when running GP services. It was reassuring when the company announced there had been “a complete change of management and significant reform of all governance and procedures” It was short-lived.


In 2019, Serco was fined £3 million by the Home Office for contract failures relating to its provision of housing for asylum seekers. In the same year, the firm signed an agreement to escape prosecution by the Serious Fraud Office over a notorious prisoner electronic-tagging scheme run by its subsidiary, Geografix. An investigation found that Geografix had engaged in fraud and false accounting, inventing half a million pounds worth of costs which were ‘complete fabrications’. Serco had to pay the government almost £100 million compensation and legal costs as a result of its subsidiary’s behaviour.


None of this matters because Serco are back, thanks to the government awarding massive NHS contracts without the checks and balances normally applied to contract tenders.


Today they operate 30% of Covid test sites, with the rest run by Sodexo and G4S, Mitie, Boots and the army. Financial ‘oversight’, courtesy of Deloitte. To date, these contracts total £500 million.


These deals have have been kept secret and are not advertised or open to public competition. Furthermore, Serco is allowed to “refine” its own service level agreements, oversee its own monitoring, and are not subject to penalties for underperformance.


David Davis MP, the former Brexit Secretary, has said, “Whilst it’s entirely understandable that the Department of Health have accelerated or maybe even short circuited some of the procurement processes in the circumstances, there is no excuse for secrecy either over the number and size of the contracts and most particularly over the level of service the contracts deliver.”


Professor Allyson Pollock, member of Independent SAGE, said it was “beyond belief” and “extraordinary” that despite “clear evidence of the extraordinary failures of the privatised test and trace system”, the government wasn’t “terminating these contracts and reinvesting it into public health services and labs which have been shown to be highly effective.”


You may have watched Panorama when a NHS health worker reported sitting at home, week after week, waiting to be alloted Covid clients. The phone never rang. The track-and-trace programme itself could not be tracked or traced.


If you check the internet, you can find that everyone from travel agents to rodent infestation companies are grabbing track-and-trace contracts.


Health minister, Edward Argar, was formerly head of public affairs at Serco, while the company’s chief executive, Rupert Soames, is the brother of former Tory MP and party grandee Nicholas Soames.


The fiasco is a result not just of corruption, but of Tory cuts to public health and their dogmatic obsession with outsourcing. Instead of throwing money at these private firms, they should have invested in the NHS and their labs to build an effective track-and-tracing service.

 



When I research the background to the coronavirus ‘business’, I am reminded of Joseph Heller’s Catch 22, but without the humour. “They buy my tomatoes at four cents apiece and sell them back to me the next day for five cents apiece. They make a profit of one cent apiece. I make a profit of three and a half cents apiece.”


Time to sit down and read Heller’s book again. But before I do I will get down to the Unite Barts picket line.

 



The two  "Serco" ward caterers, Olivia Ellor-Freeman and Lydia Kortey, who brought me tea when I had forgotten to ask for it
.


Wednesday, 26 January 2022

Pay to Live

 

 


I have a friend who has had six heart operations: three on her valves, one ablation and two cardioversions for irregulat heartbeat; the last one four months ago. 

 

A few days ago she attended her hospital for an ECG test and was told she needed a further cardioversion and that her condition was an ‘emergency’. This could not be carried out immediately because the hospital were short-staffed. ‘Don’t worry’, she was told, ‘you are not going to die’. 

 

The hospital told her she must not leave home as she might collapse. Once home, she felt ill and frightened. Living alone she is entirely dependent on outside support for all her living needs. When she rang the hospital to see if a date could be fixed for the procedure she was told that she could have the cardioversion in a week’s time as a private patient. The cost would be £2,500 with extra costs if they had to keep her as an in-patient. The NHS operation would be two weeks later and would involve the same staff and the same procedure. 

 

She is scared and when I told her she must make sure friends and emergency services were able to gain easy access to her home she started crying with fear and worry. ‘I can’t even peel an orange’ were her final words to me as I left. 

 

A strong supporter of the NHS she has been offered money from friends and relatives if she attends as a private patient. She asked me what I would do in the same circumstances. I said I would start with this blog to declare my contempt for a government that has left her with this dilemma - Your life is safer if you can pay.


Thursday, 20 January 2022

A Collage of Memories

 



26 March 2022

Woke up to coffee, messages, cards and memories from family and friends. When you get to my age, you understand the importance of living in the moment. 



Here is Anne with her collage of postcards from our travels and that is NOT us on that m/bike, but thank you Seb and Grainne for sending it to me. Seven years after my great friend made this banner with words from Maureen, gratitude to Alice for seeing me through difficult times. I'm sorry she didn’t. As for Anne? She saved my life and has been the one who carried me across those deep waters.





Thursday, 6 January 2022

Disruptive nanotechnology - at least the name and intent is honest

 

 



The Guardian reports that "Two entrepreneurs with no apparent background in healthcare have made £20m – and could make tens of millions more – after landing roles as middlemen between the UK government and a US firm that won £3.7bn of contracts to supply lateral flow tests. Charles Palmer, whose background is in property, and Kim Thonger, a former shoe retailer, are the co-owners of Disruptive Nanotechnology, a business that had just £85 in the bank and debts of £3,592 at the end of 2019."


Meanwhile Boris Johnson says some hospitals feel "at least temporarily overwhelmed” and heart attack patients calling 999 in parts of northern England are being asked to get a lift instead of waiting for an ambulance.


My question is: what has happened to the £37 billion which was available to the NHS for the Covid crisis. A rhetorical question because we know it went into the pockets of Disruptive and other Tory crony companies.


It’s only because an ambulance came for me within minutes of being called that I am here today. And the NHS has saved my life on three occasions. I would call down nine of the biblical plagues, water turning to blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts and darkness, on this evilly corrupt government, but then they would need the NHS to save their lives.

 

Monday, 20 December 2021

Venceremos in Chile

 

 


"If Chile was the birthplace of neoliberalism, it will also be its graveyard" Gabriel Boric

 

Chilean leftist, Gabriel Boric, won the country's presidential election on Sunday 19 December.


On 11 September 1973 the Chilean military imposed a junta led by General Augusto Pinochet. During the air raids and ground attacks that preceded the coup, the left-wing Popular Unity President, Salvador Allende, gave his final speech, refusing offers of safe passage into exile. I remember the photos of him in helmet, looking up from a balcony at the presidential palace as the US supplied Lockheed F-80s and British Hawker Hunters attacked after completing their destruction of radio transmission antennas and of the presidential residence at Las Condes. Witnesses claim that Allende committed suicide.


The military suspended all political activity in Chile and repressed left-wing movements. The Nixon administration promptly recognised the junta, having helped create the conditions for the coup This task had been given to Henry Kissinger who had recently been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.


Pinochet's soldiers rounded up supporters of Allende's Popular Unity party. Many were imprisoned in the Chile Stadium. The popular singer/guitarist Victor Jara had his fingers broken and the guards then taunted him to play. He managed to sing Venceremos before being riddled with bullets. If you have Netflix you can watch “Massacre at the Stadium” His last words - “How hard it is to sing when I must sing of horror / horror which I am living / horror which I am dying.”


Before the coup, Chile had been hailed as a beacon of democracy and political stability when much of South America was in the grip of their militaries. It was now to become the beacon for the playing out of the economic neo-liberal ideas of Friedrich Hayeck, Milton Friedman and James M Buchanan and supported by the policy makers, Ronald Regan, Margaret Thatcher and Alan Greenspan.


They advocated the resurgance of 19th-century free-market capitalism, now referred to as neo-liberalism. This included privatisation, deregulation, globalisation, austerity and reductions in government spending to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.


The 1973 coup was a bullet to the head for those struggling for a more equitable economic and social order, while it was a tonic to the rapid advance of the 1%.


48 years later Lucrecia Cornejo, 72, a seamstress joined the many thoudands celebrating on the streets of the capital, Santiago, and spoke not just for Chile, but for us all. "I want equality, for us not to be as they call us, the 'broken ones’ - more fairness in education, health and salaries. I want real change."

 

Venceremos



Thursday, 11 November 2021

Labour Party's topsy turvy world

 

 


I resigned from the Labour Party in February 2020. Twenty months later, on 3 November 2021, I received an email from the Party which said ...


We are writing to you to let you know that a third party that handles data on our behalf has been subject to a cyber incident. While the Party’s investigation remains ongoing, we wanted to make you aware of this incident and the measures which we have taken in response. We have also provided details of precautionary steps you may consider taking to help protect yourself.

What happened? On 29 October 2021, we were informed of the cyber incident by the third party. The third party told us that the incident had resulted in a significant quantity of Party data being rendered inaccessible on their systems. As soon as the Party was notified of these matters, we engaged third-party experts and the incident was immediately reported to the relevant authorities, including the National Crime Agency (NCA), National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The Party continues to work closely with each of these authorities. The Party is also working closely and on an urgent basis with the third party in order to understand the full nature, circumstances and impact of the incident. The Party’s own data systems were unaffected by this incident.

What information was involved? We understand that the data includes information provided to the Party by its members, registered and affiliated supporters, and other individuals who have provided their information to the Party. The full scope and impact of the incident is being urgently investigated.

What are the Labour Party doing? The Party takes the security of all personal information for which it is responsible very seriously. It is doing everything within its power to investigate and address this incident in close liaison with law enforcement, the Information Commissioner’s Office and the affected third party.

What you can do With incidents of this nature becoming increasingly common, it is more important than ever to remain vigilant against suspicious activity. As an immediate precaution, and in line with National Cyber Security Centre guidance, we recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself:

Be especially vigilant against suspicious activity, including suspicious emails, phone calls or text messages. The National Cyber Security Centre has published advice regarding suspicious emails on its website: https://ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/suspicious-email-actions

For more information If you have any questions or queries in relation to this incident, please direct them to privacy@labour.org.uk. We will also provide updates on our website in respect of this incident in line with guidance received from relevant law enforcement authorities.

Kind regards,

The Labour Party


This was my reply…

 

TO: The Labour Party

I am seeking more detail about your breach of data given that you should have deleted it when I left the party over 18 months ago. Consider this an SAR request under article 15 of the UK GDPR.

1. Provide me with greater clarity about the third party you gave my details to including their name, reason for giving it,, when you gave it and the exact details you gave to the third party.

2. Provide me with the names of all parties you have shared my data with, again with reasons for sharing, times and dates and the exact details that were shared,

3. Provide me with details of when and to what extent I granted you permission to give my details to any third party,

4. Provide me with all information you hold on record about me.

5. Provide me with an explanation as to why you did not delete my personal data when I left the Labour Party.

6. You suggested what I should do even though the responsibility for this data breach is yours, not mine. Provide me with details as to what measures you have put in place to ensure there is no repetition of a similar breach.

7. Provide assurances that all third parties you have shared my details with have deleted my personal data. Please inform me when you have deleted my personal data except for this email address.

Please be aware that you should respond without delay and within one month of this request.

Regards

David Wilson


and this is their reply to me:


Hello

Thank you for making a subject access request (otherwise known as a “SAR”). We will respond to your query as quickly as we can, as we are currently receiving a large volume of enquiries. If you have not already provided the below, please send that to dataprotection@labour.org.uk
If we do not receive your ID, we will assume you do not wish to progress your SAR.
What do you need from me?

  • Provide us with your ID. We ask for a copy of photo ID (e.g. driving licence, passport) from requesters to guard against unauthorised or unwarranted attempts to access your confidential information. This is in line with guidance provided by the Information Commissioner’s Office. On verifying your identity, copies of any documents you provide will not be retained, and will be securely and permanently deleted.

  • Limit the scope of your request (if you have not done so already). It is likely your request will be returned much sooner if you limit the scope of your request. This could include providing the following:

-Date range – e.g. any emails between June 2015 and March 2016
-Specific search terms – e.g. where “Doncaster North CLP” has been mentioned alongside my name
-Specific conversations/email trails between named individuals
-Only related to a certain event – e.g. only about the complaint I raised/the dispute I was involved in

  • Provide us with your postcode and membership number. This ensures we can locate you on our systems.

Thank you if you have already specified the scope of your request in your original correspondence to us.
What information will I obtain from a SAR?
A Subject Access Request will provide the personal data the Labour Party is processing about you. There are however exemptions which apply to the disclosure of this data.
The Labour Party will apply limited redactions in line with the provisions given under the Data Protection Act 2018 (Schedule 2, Part 3 Para 16). It is therefore important to note that 3rd party personal data, as well as any information provided to us in a 3rd party capacity (e.g. complaints made to the Party which mention your name) are likely to be redacted, or removed entirely, before the information is disclosed to you. This reflects the need to also respect the privacy rights of the 3rd party and is in line with the ICO’s detailed guidance on SARs, which you can find here.
The Labour Party will also include the following information as part of your request:

•Any profiling carried out using your personal data
•Personal data transfers internationally
•Other rights available to you under the GDPR
•Retention periods
•Your right to complain to the regulator

In accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act 2018, we will respond to your subject access request within 30 calendar days of date of receipt. You should be aware that there are provisions which allow us to extend the timeframe for response by a further two months where we determine that a request is either excessive or complex. I will confirm whether the party intends to apply this extension once we have conducted our initial searches.
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection Team| The Labour Party


So no apology for this "incident", which is a major breach of data protection, but a lengthy explanation of what steps I must take to protect myself from data abuse. Then a request for detailed information about myself, my membership number and emails, search terms and so on. When I resigned I binned my membership card and since the LP has me on their records – that is why I received the initial email from them – why must I give them further details? My personal data should have been deleted from Labour Party files when I resigned my membership instead of which they now want MORE information about me. This is beyond crazy.