Tuesday, 11 January 2022

My World Café - Riversmeet blog

 

 

Riversmeet will be publishing my new book, My World Café. Here is 

their first blog about it.


It is a stew of food stories, memories and recipes from around the world, ranging from popcorn to borscht, apple strudel to burritos, baklava to teriyaki. Each chapter includes a brief history of the food, a personal memory and a recipe. Laura Davis will be illustrating the book. 

 

Here is an excerpt from the chapter on “Strozzapretti”:

 

Originating in Perugia, strozzapreti is hand-rolled pasta which roughly translates as ‘priest-strangler’. One explanation is that gluttonous priests so loved the pasta that they ate it too quickly and choked themselves. Another explanation is that women offered the pasta to churchmen as payment for land rents. Their husbands were so angered by venal priests eating their wives’ food that they wished the priests would choke on it. The most likely reason to me is that it was common practice for priests to visit parishioners’ homes after Sunday Mass and when the hosts tired of his visit, they would serve this ‘rough’ pasta to let him know that he had overstayed his welcome. 

 

My World Café is my second book. Left FieldThe Memoir of a Lifelong Activist was published by Unbound in 2016.David has lived a life and a half. The broken world needed people like David; it still does.” —Sir Tom Stoppard  “This is an excellent and inspiring book. David is an adventurer and a freethinker, who did something truly useful with his life.” —Brian Eno

 

 ****

 

"Riversmeet focuses on high quality writing, performance and teaching which engages with contemporary issues by linking the past to the present."

 

 


 

 


 


 





Thursday, 6 January 2022

Disruptive nanotechnology - at least the name and intent is honest

 

 



The Guardian reports that "Two entrepreneurs with no apparent background in healthcare have made £20m – and could make tens of millions more – after landing roles as middlemen between the UK government and a US firm that won £3.7bn of contracts to supply lateral flow tests. Charles Palmer, whose background is in property, and Kim Thonger, a former shoe retailer, are the co-owners of Disruptive Nanotechnology, a business that had just £85 in the bank and debts of £3,592 at the end of 2019."


Meanwhile Boris Johnson says some hospitals feel "at least temporarily overwhelmed” and heart attack patients calling 999 in parts of northern England are being asked to get a lift instead of waiting for an ambulance.


My question is: what has happened to the £37 billion which was available to the NHS for the Covid crisis. A rhetorical question because we know it went into the pockets of Disruptive and other Tory crony companies.


It’s only because an ambulance came for me within minutes of being called that I am here today. And the NHS has saved my life on three occasions. I would call down nine of the biblical plagues, water turning to blood, frogs, lice, flies, livestock pestilence, boils, hail, locusts and darkness, on this evilly corrupt government, but then they would need the NHS to save their lives.

 

Monday, 20 December 2021

Venceremos in Chile

 

 


"If Chile was the birthplace of neoliberalism, it will also be its graveyard" Gabriel Boric

 

Chilean leftist, Gabriel Boric, won the country's presidential election on Sunday 19 December.


On 11 September 1973 the Chilean military imposed a junta led by General Augusto Pinochet. During the air raids and ground attacks that preceded the coup, the left-wing Popular Unity President, Salvador Allende, gave his final speech, refusing offers of safe passage into exile. I remember the photos of him in helmet, looking up from a balcony at the presidential palace as the US supplied Lockheed F-80s and British Hawker Hunters attacked after completing their destruction of radio transmission antennas and of the presidential residence at Las Condes. Witnesses claim that Allende committed suicide.


The military suspended all political activity in Chile and repressed left-wing movements. The Nixon administration promptly recognised the junta, having helped create the conditions for the coup This task had been given to Henry Kissinger who had recently been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.


Pinochet's soldiers rounded up supporters of Allende's Popular Unity party. Many were imprisoned in the Chile Stadium. The popular singer/guitarist Victor Jara had his fingers broken and the guards then taunted him to play. He managed to sing Venceremos before being riddled with bullets. If you have Netflix you can watch “Massacre at the Stadium” His last words - “How hard it is to sing when I must sing of horror / horror which I am living / horror which I am dying.”


Before the coup, Chile had been hailed as a beacon of democracy and political stability when much of South America was in the grip of their militaries. It was now to become the beacon for the playing out of the economic neo-liberal ideas of Friedrich Hayeck, Milton Friedman and James M Buchanan and supported by the policy makers, Ronald Regan, Margaret Thatcher and Alan Greenspan.


They advocated the resurgance of 19th-century free-market capitalism, now referred to as neo-liberalism. This included privatisation, deregulation, globalisation, austerity and reductions in government spending to increase the role of the private sector in the economy and society.


The 1973 coup was a bullet to the head for those struggling for a more equitable economic and social order, while it was a tonic to the rapid advance of the 1%.


48 years later Lucrecia Cornejo, 72, a seamstress joined the many thoudands celebrating on the streets of the capital, Santiago, and spoke not just for Chile, but for us all. "I want equality, for us not to be as they call us, the 'broken ones’ - more fairness in education, health and salaries. I want real change."

 

Venceremos



Thursday, 11 November 2021

Labour Party's topsy turvy world

 

 


I resigned from the Labour Party in February 2020. Twenty months later, on 3 November 2021, I received an email from the Party which said ...


We are writing to you to let you know that a third party that handles data on our behalf has been subject to a cyber incident. While the Party’s investigation remains ongoing, we wanted to make you aware of this incident and the measures which we have taken in response. We have also provided details of precautionary steps you may consider taking to help protect yourself.

What happened? On 29 October 2021, we were informed of the cyber incident by the third party. The third party told us that the incident had resulted in a significant quantity of Party data being rendered inaccessible on their systems. As soon as the Party was notified of these matters, we engaged third-party experts and the incident was immediately reported to the relevant authorities, including the National Crime Agency (NCA), National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The Party continues to work closely with each of these authorities. The Party is also working closely and on an urgent basis with the third party in order to understand the full nature, circumstances and impact of the incident. The Party’s own data systems were unaffected by this incident.

What information was involved? We understand that the data includes information provided to the Party by its members, registered and affiliated supporters, and other individuals who have provided their information to the Party. The full scope and impact of the incident is being urgently investigated.

What are the Labour Party doing? The Party takes the security of all personal information for which it is responsible very seriously. It is doing everything within its power to investigate and address this incident in close liaison with law enforcement, the Information Commissioner’s Office and the affected third party.

What you can do With incidents of this nature becoming increasingly common, it is more important than ever to remain vigilant against suspicious activity. As an immediate precaution, and in line with National Cyber Security Centre guidance, we recommend you take the following steps to protect yourself:

Be especially vigilant against suspicious activity, including suspicious emails, phone calls or text messages. The National Cyber Security Centre has published advice regarding suspicious emails on its website: https://ncsc.gov.uk/guidance/suspicious-email-actions

For more information If you have any questions or queries in relation to this incident, please direct them to privacy@labour.org.uk. We will also provide updates on our website in respect of this incident in line with guidance received from relevant law enforcement authorities.

Kind regards,

The Labour Party


This was my reply…

 

TO: The Labour Party

I am seeking more detail about your breach of data given that you should have deleted it when I left the party over 18 months ago. Consider this an SAR request under article 15 of the UK GDPR.

1. Provide me with greater clarity about the third party you gave my details to including their name, reason for giving it,, when you gave it and the exact details you gave to the third party.

2. Provide me with the names of all parties you have shared my data with, again with reasons for sharing, times and dates and the exact details that were shared,

3. Provide me with details of when and to what extent I granted you permission to give my details to any third party,

4. Provide me with all information you hold on record about me.

5. Provide me with an explanation as to why you did not delete my personal data when I left the Labour Party.

6. You suggested what I should do even though the responsibility for this data breach is yours, not mine. Provide me with details as to what measures you have put in place to ensure there is no repetition of a similar breach.

7. Provide assurances that all third parties you have shared my details with have deleted my personal data. Please inform me when you have deleted my personal data except for this email address.

Please be aware that you should respond without delay and within one month of this request.

Regards

David Wilson


and this is their reply to me:


Hello

Thank you for making a subject access request (otherwise known as a “SAR”). We will respond to your query as quickly as we can, as we are currently receiving a large volume of enquiries. If you have not already provided the below, please send that to dataprotection@labour.org.uk
If we do not receive your ID, we will assume you do not wish to progress your SAR.
What do you need from me?

  • Provide us with your ID. We ask for a copy of photo ID (e.g. driving licence, passport) from requesters to guard against unauthorised or unwarranted attempts to access your confidential information. This is in line with guidance provided by the Information Commissioner’s Office. On verifying your identity, copies of any documents you provide will not be retained, and will be securely and permanently deleted.

  • Limit the scope of your request (if you have not done so already). It is likely your request will be returned much sooner if you limit the scope of your request. This could include providing the following:

-Date range – e.g. any emails between June 2015 and March 2016
-Specific search terms – e.g. where “Doncaster North CLP” has been mentioned alongside my name
-Specific conversations/email trails between named individuals
-Only related to a certain event – e.g. only about the complaint I raised/the dispute I was involved in

  • Provide us with your postcode and membership number. This ensures we can locate you on our systems.

Thank you if you have already specified the scope of your request in your original correspondence to us.
What information will I obtain from a SAR?
A Subject Access Request will provide the personal data the Labour Party is processing about you. There are however exemptions which apply to the disclosure of this data.
The Labour Party will apply limited redactions in line with the provisions given under the Data Protection Act 2018 (Schedule 2, Part 3 Para 16). It is therefore important to note that 3rd party personal data, as well as any information provided to us in a 3rd party capacity (e.g. complaints made to the Party which mention your name) are likely to be redacted, or removed entirely, before the information is disclosed to you. This reflects the need to also respect the privacy rights of the 3rd party and is in line with the ICO’s detailed guidance on SARs, which you can find here.
The Labour Party will also include the following information as part of your request:

•Any profiling carried out using your personal data
•Personal data transfers internationally
•Other rights available to you under the GDPR
•Retention periods
•Your right to complain to the regulator

In accordance with the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection Act 2018, we will respond to your subject access request within 30 calendar days of date of receipt. You should be aware that there are provisions which allow us to extend the timeframe for response by a further two months where we determine that a request is either excessive or complex. I will confirm whether the party intends to apply this extension once we have conducted our initial searches.
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection Team| The Labour Party


So no apology for this "incident", which is a major breach of data protection, but a lengthy explanation of what steps I must take to protect myself from data abuse. Then a request for detailed information about myself, my membership number and emails, search terms and so on. When I resigned I binned my membership card and since the LP has me on their records – that is why I received the initial email from them – why must I give them further details? My personal data should have been deleted from Labour Party files when I resigned my membership instead of which they now want MORE information about me. This is beyond crazy.




Tuesday, 12 October 2021

taking it on the chin

 

 

“We should just take it on the chin.” Boris Johnson

 

As of October 4, 2021, the number of confirmed UK deaths due to coronavirus is 136,986.


Britain’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic is one of the worst public health failures in UK history, with the government’s “fatalistic” approach resulting in the huge death toll. According to a report titled “Coronavirus: lessons learned to date” that was headed by two former Conservative ministers, the UK’s “slow and gradualist” approach meant the the country fared “significantly worse” than other nations. 

 

Impaired by lack of transparency, the crisis exposed “major deficiencies in the machinery of government”, with public bodies unable to share vital information and scientific advice. 

 

Despite being one of the first countries to develop a test for Covid, the UK “squandered” its lead and “converted it into one of permanent crisis ... For a country with a world-class expertise in data analysis, to face the biggest health crisis in 100 years with virtually no data to analyse was an almost unimaginable setback.”

 

It’s not all bad news. Ministers have handed out billions of pounds in Covid mateocracy contracts and right now, the man in charge is lying beside the Marbella pool of a Tory donor who bought himself a lordly title. And hey, it would have been so much worse if Jeremy Corbyn had been PM.